|
Deck lights come in five styles: bull's-eye,
hex pyramid, reamer, ribbed and rectangular prism.
|
Bull's-Eye
|
Bull's-eye lenses (usually plano-convex: flat on one side and
convex on the other) are generally the oldest style, pre-dating
prismatic shapes. When used as a deck light, the flat surface
would be flush with the deck, with the curved lens hanging below,
though Apsley Pellat's 1807 British patent
"Lighting the Interior of Ships, Buildings, &c."
uses the lens in the opposite fashion: "This illuminator is a
piece of solid glass of a circular or elliptical form at the base,
but the circular form is the most productive of light, and the
strongest against accident; it is convex on the side to be presented
outwards to receive and condense the rays of light, and has a flat
or plane surface on the inside of the room or apartment, which it
is intended to light."
Earlier patents (Wyndus 1684,
Cole 1704) do not give any
detail about the shape of the glasses used. Thaddeus Hyatt's famous
1845 patent ("Vault Cover"), the
basis of the "Hyatt Lights" which made his fortune, used small
bull's-eyes: "I prefer to make my illuminating glasses circular,
and convex on one side".
Shown below is Henry Lanergan's lens of 1861 which
features threaded sides and a protruding hexagonal boss, allowing
damaged or worn-out lenses to be quickly replaced by simply
unscrewing the old lens and screwed in a new one in. The smaller
Lanergan shown below (3" diameter, 2" thick) is heavily worn on
the working surface and was presumably removed from service and
replaced; the larger lens (4" diameter, 2" thick) is only lightly
worn and still perfectly useable.
A plain 6" bull's-eye lens is being produced today by
Marine Skylights.
|
|
Hexagonal Pyramid aka
"Pointed" or "Spike"
|
Pyramids usually in two nominal sizes, 3" and 4" (measured across
the flats), although Thomas Laughlin Co. lists them in 3½" and
4½". I don't have any original examples of the larger size.
This style has been reproduced in vast numbers, mostly from the lone
surviving original prism on the
Charles W. Morgan, now at
Mystic Seaport. You can buy them
wholesale from the Mystic Seaport Museum Shop,
wholesale@mysticseaport.org, (800) 331-2665, or by the onesies at
a thousand other places (just search for "deck prism").
My originals all have a sharp edge at the base and are somewhat
crude, unlike the modern reproductions which have smooth, rounded
base edges and are of uniformly higher production quality. Reproductions
come in many beautiful but unauthentic colors which would be useless
for anything except mood lighting.
|
 |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
W: 3 1/8";
H: 3½";
B: 1 1/8" |
W: 3 1/8";
H: 3½";
B: 1" |
W: 3 1/8";
H: ~3¼";
B: ¾" |
|
Reamer
|
This style prism looks very much like an orange juicer,
aka reamer. I don't know the design's origins; it's
not shown in any of my catalogs, nor do I know of a patent
which covers it. My one example has a yellow tint that looks
to be caused by selenium, the decolorizer which replaced manganese
around WWI. Like manganese, which changes color after prolonged
UV exposure (solarizing), selenium also changes color, turning
straw, yellow or amber depending on the concentration. Selenium
was used mainly post-war, around 1920-1930, with usage tapering
off by mid-century.
The Mother of All Reamers below is 7¾" in diameter and
weights 10¼#. This is much larger than the typical
units which are 3 - 4" in diameter. It was reported to have been
retrieved from the bottom of the Baltic. Is it Russian? There
are no markings.
Reamers in a variety of sizes and depths are still made today by
both Marine Skylights and
Marshall Machine and Engineering Works. Nobody is making a Mother Reamer, however.
|
|
Rectangular Prism
|
RECTANGULAR |
|
Ribbed
|
The ribbed style appears in three of my early catalogs (Durkee,
Laughlin and Tiebout) dating from 1915 to 1920, but I have yet to
see any actual examples, nor have I seen any pictures of old ones
installed in any ship.
All three catalogs list exactly the same set of sizes: 6"×3",
9½"×2½", 10"×3",
10½"×3½" and 12"×4". Perhaps these
three companies were all selling exactly the same product from
a single manufacturer? They certainly look identical in the
catalog drawings. This style does not appear to be in production
currently.
|
|