Home Index Site Map Up: Hayward Navigation
Up: Hayward

First: Years of Reflection 1783-1953 - Front Dust Jacket Last: Years of Reflection 1783-1953 - Back Dust Jacket Prev: Years of Reflection 1783-1953 - Page 80 Next: Years of Reflection 1783-1953 - Page 82 Navigation
YOR: 83 of 113
·FDJ ·22 ·45 §68 ·91
·FC ·23 ·46 ·69 ·92
·Ins ·24 ·47 ·70 ·93
·T1 ·25 ·48 ·71 ·94
·T2 ·26 ·49 ·72 §95
§Ack §27 ·50 ·73 ·96
§FW ·28 ·51 ·74 ·97
§6 ·29 ·52 ·75 ·98
·7 ·30 ·53 ·76 ·99
·8 ·31 §54 ·77 ·100
§9 ·32 ·55 ·78 ·101
·10 ·33 ·56 ·79 ·102
·11 ·34 ·57 ·80 ·103
·12 ·35 ·58 §81 ·104
·13 ·36 ·59 ·82 ·105
·14 ·37 ·60 ·83 ·106
·15 §38 ·61 ·84 ·107
·16 ·39 ·62 ·85 §108
·17 ·40 ·63 ·86 ·109
·18 ·41 ·64 ·87 ·BC
·19 ·42 ·65 ·88 ·BDJ
·20 ·43 ·66 ·89
·21 ·44 ·67 ·90

Page 81 (Chapter VI)

 
Chapter VI



"Progress is the law of life."
Robert Browning


    The end of the first world war brought the whole future of Haywards under review. The considerable extensions to the Union Street premises in 1906 absorbing Nos. 195/201 had been planned for production methods and materials now out-moded and the directors decided therefore to take advantage of the urgent demand for warehouses and other buildings in the centre of London to dispose of this part of their property. Accordingly, in July 1919, this section was sold.
    This was the first move in the decentralisation of what had hitherto been concentrated in Union Street. Obviously, with so comprehensive a development in manufacture, the old Union Street premises, acquired piecemeal, were no long suitable for modern economical production. Labour was becoming more costly and the reception and storage of materials growing more difficult, aso adding to expense.
    The decision to dispose of Nos. 195/201 was no "step in the dark," as William Eckstein might have put it. Undoubtedly, in pressing the necessity for complete re-organisation on the production side, H. T. Walker took the initiative and from start to finish carried the whole scheme through. His fellow directors, whilst enthusiastically supporting the scheme, were content to defer to his judgment on every aspect of the new project, for he had