Home Index Site Map Up: 3-Way Prism Navigation
Up: 3-Way Prism

First: American 3-Way Lighting Systems - Front Cover Last: American 3-Way Lighting Systems - Back Cover Prev: American 3-Way Lighting Systems - Page 10 Next: American 3-Way Lighting Systems - Page 12 Navigation
Catalog 14-S
12 of 18

·Front Cover
·Page 1
·Page 2
·Page 3
·Page 4
·Page 5
·Page 6
·Page 7
·Page 8
·Page 9
·Page 10
·Page 11
·Page 12
·Page 13
·Page 14
·Page 15
·Page 16
·Back Cover

Page 11

 
3-Way Simplex Strength Test
    We recently made two distinctly different tests of the strength of the Simplex sidewalk and skylight preformed slabs. The first by Gaut and Chase, Engineers, was planned to approximate, as closely as possible, real traffic conditions. The report shows that the sidewalk slab carried a distributed load of 1753 pounds to the square foot.
    To confirm these figures and to satisfy ourselves that here was a construction that was unbreakable under any ordinary condition we commissioned Robert W. Hunt & Co. to make a strength test of the same types of SIMPLEX slabs with the hydraulic press.     Gentlemen:--Report of the "Transverse Tests" on specimens of your SIMPLEX Double Reinforced Concrete SIDEWALK Construction made with your glass No. 61.
    Construction. The specimens tested were 15" wide by 54", 78", and 102" long, respectively. In the 15" width there were three rows of the No. 61 glass.
    The longitudinal reinforcement, entirely embedded in concrete, consists of four eye beams 1½" high with a web thickness of approximately 1/8" and a width across the flange of 3/8". These eye beams were spaced 4¼" to 4½" c. to c. Transverse reinforcement consisted of 5/16" twisted square bars spaced 4¼" c. to c. and carried through the web of longitudinal eye beams at a location 1½" to 1 9/16" from top of slab.
    Conduct of Tests. Specimens were successively placed on supports 8', 6' and 4' c. to c. The loads were applied on the 1/3 points of the spans and under increasing loads the deflections at the center of the spans were measured. The observed loads and deflections were carefully plotted.
    Summary of Tests. The following is a summary of the deflections under calculated uniformly distributed loads.
Slab No. 61-6 61-5 61-4
Span in Feet 4' 6' 8'
Cal.Distr.Load, Lbs. per Square Foot Deflections at Center of Span, Inches
0 .0 .0 .0
50 .0 .0 .03
100 .0 .02 .19
150 .01 .09 .35
200 .03 .14 .53
250 .04 .19 .69
300 .05 .25 .85
350 .07 .31 1.05
400 .08 .38 1.41
450 .09 .44 1.77
500 .10 .51 2.29
550 .12 .57 3.25
600 .13 .64
700 .15 .70
800 .17 1.02
900 .19 1.45
1000 .22
1200 .28
1400 .34
1600 .42
1800 .51
2000 .68
2200 .96
Max.Distr.Load
Sustained
2310991560
Deflections under Maximum Load 1.402.203.50
(Signed) ROBERT W. HUNT & CO.
Load of 28,650 Pounds of Lead Billets on 5 Foot Span, Supported at Ends Only
Load of 28,650 Pounds of Lead Billets on 5 Foot Span,
Supported at Ends Only

    Gentlemen:--Simplex Slabs tested were American 3-Way Prism Company's Standard SIMPLEX CONSTRUCTION. Tests were all conducted under conditions identical with those which prevail in actual service and with uniformly distributed loads.
    Readings were taken with a level 2 in. by 2 in. wood standard, two scales being read after each load increment. One scale was graduated to thirty-second of an inch, the other to hundredths of a foot.

Tests

Simplex Skylight Slab: 3'6"×6'6"×2 1/8"
Bearings--8" I Beams. Bearing surface, top flange 4".
Span--5' 0" c. to c. bearings; 4' 8" clear span.
Area loaded--4' 8"×3' 6"--16.33 sq. ft.
Loading   Deflection
Increment Total Per sq. ft. Total
      Inches Feet
000000
19101,910116.91/160.0052
19103,820233.81/80.0104
19105,730350.77/320.0182
19107,640467.69/320.0234
19109,550584.55/160.0260
191011,460701.413/320.0339
191013,370818.317/320.0443
191015,280935.221/320.0547
191017,2801052.125/320.0651
191019,1001169.07/80.0729
191021,0101285.931/320.0807
191022,9201402.81-1/160.0885
191024,8301519.71-7/320.1016
191026,7401636.61-3/80.1146
1910286501753.5

    After fourteenth load was applied deflection continued until total deflection of 2 inches was reached. Load was remove and slab returned to within ½" inch of original alignment, within ten minutes. Concrete on top surface slightly scaled, total area scaled about fourteen square inches. Concrete on bottom side showed eight tension cracks through middle third of slab.
    After load was removed all cracks closed as slab regained normal position.
(Signed), GAUT AND CHASE, Engineers