Up: Glassmaking Reminiscences 5 of 123 ·i ·23 ·48 ·73 ·98 ·iii ·24 ·49 §74 ·99 ·iv ·25 ·50 ·75 ·100 §1 ·26 ·51 §76 ·101 ·2 ·27 §52 ·77 ·102 ·3 ·28 ·53 §78 ·103 ·4 ·29 ·54 ·79 ·104 ·5 ·30 ·55 §80 §105 ·6 ·31 ·56 ·81 ·106 ·7 ·32 ·57 ·82 ·107 §8 §33 ·58 ·83 ·108 ·9 ·34 ·59 ·84 ·109 ·10 ·35 ·60 ·85 §110 ·11 §36 ·61 ·86 §111 ·12 ·37 ·62 ·87 §112 ·13 ·38 ·63 ·88 ·113 ·14 ·39 ·64 ·89 §114 ·15 ·40 ·65 ·90 §115 ·16 ·41 ·66 ·91 ·116 ·17 ·42 ·67 ·92 §117 ·18 §43 ·68 §93 ·119 ·19 ·44 ·69 ·94 ·121 ·20 ·45 ·70 ·95 ·123 ·21 ·46 ·71 §96 ·22 ·47 ·72 ·97

Petronius Arbiter, Berzelias, Neri, Merrit, Runket, and others, referring constantly to it. The writings of all these demonstrate the deep interest existing upon the subject at their various times, but still fail to present us with any connected or detailed account of the rise and progress of the art.     When it is considered that the elements involved in the manufacture of glass are derived from the earth,-- not one of its components being in itself transparent, but earthy, opaque, and apparently incapable of being transmuted into a transparent and brilliant substance,-- when it is considered that from these a material is produced almost rivalling the diamond in lustre and refractive power, and sometimes so closely resembling the richest gems as to detract from the value of the costliest; can it be wonderful that in the earliest ages the art was invested with a mysterious interest attaching to no other mechanical department?     From the earliest periods, up to the eighteenth century, the art, from the peculiar knowledge and skill involved, could only minister to the wants or pleasures of the luxurious rich. The rarity of the material rendered the articles greatly valuable, as tasteful ornaments of dress or furniture;